 |
 |
 |
|
Q: |
|
I am a student incorporating concepts from Random Designer into
a paper I am writing. In the process of my study, I keep running into this question: Is
there really any need for a Creator? In other words, if creation is simply a natural
process, would it have occurred anyway, regardless of the existence of a Creator? |
 |
|
A: |
|
The answer to this question depends upon what you call natural. Of course,
natural has been claimed by ‘naturalists’ to imply the exclusion of an ultimate creative
source, but I think this is an error. First of all, it is NOT a logical or legitimate
conclusion of science. In addition, such a conclusion simply does not go back far enough
or to deep enough levels.
For if one concludes that natural law alone created, it begs
the question of who then created the natural laws. Who endowed the universe with just the
right combination of physical and chemical properties to make it all happen in the first
place? I think you know what I think.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
